Things I have been reading this week
This article has been sparking some interest and as the blog I originally wrote it on is defunct I decided to republish it on here.
Article originally published 05/02/12 some details may be out of date.
When I speak to people about politics, especially in the Labour Party, a common complaint is that Young Women just aren’t interested in politics. To many being interested in politics is all about attending Branch or G.C meetings and running for office.
To which my reply is always the same “well have you asked them?” This gets varying responses from ummm… to well we did once but didn’t get any response back so didn’t bother again. They then go on to complain about young people in general which gives you an idea of what the real problem is.
People expect that young women won’t be interested in politics and therefore don’t put the effort in to welcome them to meetings or invite them to events. Many young political women I have spoken to have at some point attended a meeting and had a bad experience. In my own experience my first Branch meeting scared me off for a year despite already being politically active within the Labour party. There is this expectation that if you are new to a group your role is to sit down, shut up, listen and learn. Very few people felt welcome in their first meeting which is a major issue for any new member let alone young or female ones.
Going to a branch meeting where you don’t know anyone is a scary experience that could be made easier simply by people greeting you with a friendly word and a smile. There is an already acknowledged problem of male members monopolising any discussions, added to this is the idea that young people don’t know what they’re talking about and a tendency to talk down to them unless they are a member of long standing or to chastise them like a small child.
With experiences like that is there any wonder that young women don’t tend to go to branch or G.C more than a couple of times? Yet this doesn’t mean they aren’t politically active; many are involved with single issue campaigns, electioneering, online activism and protests. All of these methods of political activism are just as valid as working within the party system.
The main issue as I see it is the lack of young women running for office. I have been told that at 23 I am the youngest women elected at borough level and above. (This has recently changed) Compare that to the case of Jake Morrison elected councillor at the age of 18, the difference between 23 and 18 may not seem much but as much as “a week is a long time in politics” the same can be said for years of age. So why are young men running for, and getting elected, office and young women not doing the same? Could this be due to their lack of participation within the Party organisation? The sexism and ageism inherent in the system? A lack of confidence in young women resulting in them not being put forward? or simply because they cannot be bothered?
Firstly I don’t believe that it is because they cannot be bothered, I know many capable and amazing young women within the Labour Party some of whom have run for election. If we draw comparisons with the workplace, studies have shown that men will apply for jobs when they have around 20% of the qualifications needed whereas women will only apply when they have closer to 80%. There is a confidence gap between the genders and women tend to perceive themselves as less skilled or able than they are. Because of this women who run tend to start in unwinnables and go on to become a better “bet” as they get older and more experienced in electioneering.
The sexism and ageism within politics has been handled many times by writers and academics more skilled than myself suffice to say a quick google search will bring up many excellent articles
Intelligence Squared Debate
It is all well and good discussing the sexism in politics but what can we do about getting young women involved? Rather than spend all my time criticising I would like to suggest some practical methods that I have found have worked personally.
But most importantly, going back to the beginning, Ask them! Ask them to attend, ask them why they aren’t attending and ask them what you can do to encourage them to attend.
You never know until you try!
A while back I bought a book by Kenneth Morgan called Labour People: Leaders and Lieutenants, Hardie to Kinnock, Out of the 36+ people this book covers only 3 of them are female and one of these is only mentioned in association with her husband. So I thought I’d do my version of Labour People, a whistlestop tour of some of the people (especially women) who make our politics so interesting but often get left out.
I kinda have to start with Jennie seeing as she’s emblazoned across the top of my blog.
Often dismissed as Nye Bevan’s wife Jennie Lee is an intensely fascinating woman and one of my heroes. The daughter of a Scottish Miner Jennie was brought up in a fiercely socialist household where such leading lights of the ILP such as James Maxton and Robert Smilie were frequent visitors.
Jennie was often known as the high priestess of socialism, never bending in her principles. Jennie Lee was elected to Parliament at a by-election in February 1929 when she turned a 2,028 Conservative majority into a Labour majority of 6,578. At twenty-four she was the youngest member of the House of Commons. She was also too young to be able to vote for herself.
Immediately Jennie found herself at odds with the PLP and broke convention, both by choosing to reject the sponsors chosen for her in favour of her old friends and by launching a blisteringly ferocious maiden speech attacking the government.
In 1931 Jennie lost her seat due to the Conservative landslide and in 1932 she left the Labour Party in the ILP split, although torn she stuck to her friends in the ILP a move which provoked Nye Bevan’s famously misquoted retort
As for you, I tell you, what the epitaph on you Scottish dissenters will be – pure, but impotent. Yes, you will be pure all right. But, remember, at the price of impotency. You will not influence the course of British politics by as much as a hair’s-breadth. Why don’t you get into a nunnery and be done with it? Lock yourself up in a cell away from the world and its wickedness. My Salvation Army lassie… Poor little Casabianca! That was a hell of an intelligent performance, wasn’t it? I tell you, it is the Labour Party or nothing. I know all its faults, all its dangers. But it is the Party that we have taught millions of working people to look to and regard as their own. We can’t undo what we have done. And I am by no means convinced that something cannot yet be made of it. (Michael Foot – Aneurin Bevan)
After the unexpected death of her lover Frank Wise in 1933 Jennie married Aneurin Bevan in 1934.
Between her defeat and re-election in ’45 Jennie wrote articles for left-wing journals and newspapers and lectured in America, Canada and Europe. She raised funds and awareness of the Spanish civil war and international brigades, worked with Lord Beaverbrook on defence, factories and blimps, was House of Commons reporter for the Daily Mail, maintained a regular column in Tribune and stood for election in Bristol Central on a promise of full implementation of the Beveridge Report.
However when re-elected in ’45 Jennie had made too many enemies and wasn’t given a position in the new government. Instead she chose to support her husband and step out of the limelight.
It is easy for me to behave in a way that would smash both our lives. I see no way in which I can save both. If only one is to be saved it must be yours … You cannot adjust to suit me. You simply could not do it. Not only your own ego would be outraged. All the external pressures of the contemporary social framework would be on your side. It is the woman’s part to give way, to make life smooth, to walk by your side.
Although she often disagreed with Bevan’s more pragmatic socialism (when compared to her holy flame) she attempted to remain in this position until his death in 1960. Although she was often blamed for Bevan’s walkouts and resignations she may have merely been an easy target, “the dark angel at his shoulder”.
Near the end of Nye’s life and after his death Jennie was able to resume her own career, She became a member of the National Executive Committee from 1958-1970 and was chairman from 1967-1968.
More importantly she was able to create a lasting legacy which continues to this day. In 1951 Harold Wilson had joined Bevan in resigning from the cabinet over health service charges and Korea. This can be seen as the moment which truly created Bevanism. During this time Wilson had got to truly know and appreciate Jennie and in 1964 invited her into his government. The position of Minister for the Arts was created especially for her and she threw herself into it with gusto.
One of the early problems she faced was that the Arts Council had settled into a position of excellence over access, rather than arts for the many it had become the best for the few. This led to them favouring professionals over amateurs, London over ‘the provinces’, and within London they focused on the national companies over smaller ones. Jennie refused this mindset and refused the idea that there was an inherent conflict between excellence and access, more did not mean worse. Although the establishment was scared of the wide eyed, fiery radical they soon began to appreciate her once she’d trebled their budget in six years. They still sneered about her lack of artistic credibility but once she had pushed through the South Bank National Theatre, a half century old project, they came to respect and even admire her. To Jennie no was not an answer and she used every means at her disposal to get her own way, including funneling most of the money she gain to the regions (no more snarky comments about provinces were allowed around her).
She encouraged local authorities to support not only libraries and museums, but art, music and drama in their schools; to aid amateur groups; to run local arts centres even in the smallest towns. A doctrine of ‘response’, it meant that the Arts Council would not parachute into a city to impose some version of London high culture; rather it would only respond to and support local initiatives, local bids, grounded in the local community.
In many ways we owe Jennie a lot for her championing of local art and regional centres of excellence.
However she was not finished there. Harold Wilson assigned her to finding a way to make his ‘University of the air’ a physical possibility. And so Jennie poured her immense energy into creating what has been called the greatest achievement of Wilson’s Labour Government, The Open University.
She felt that adult education should be more than ‘dowdy and mouldy… old-fashioned night schools … hard benches’. Lee was mindful of the fact that Adult Education was, as the OU’s first Vice-Chancellor, Walter Perry, put it, to be ‘the patch on the backside of our educational trousers’. Her 1966 White Paper, A University of the Air made it clear that ‘There can be no question of offering to students a makeshift project inferior in quality to other universities. That would defeat its whole purpose’.
Lee was defeated at the 1970 election in Cannock by Patrick Cormack and she retired from frontline politics when she was made Baroness Lee of Asheridge, of the City of Westminster on 5 November 1970.
She died in 1988 from natural causes at the age of 84.
There is so much more that could be said about Jennie, so below I have linked places where I have gotten quotes, information and general knowledge that I hope will be of interest.
My life with Nye – Jennie Lee (one of my favourite political autobiographies)
Aneurin Bevan – Michael Foot
long time no see.
I know I’ve been awful at updating this thing, all I can say is I was busy, also uninspired and flat out lazy.
I was inspired to give this lark another go by this post Supporting Johanna Baxter, you should read it. It’s great.
I have made it very obvious on a number of media that I am opposed to the whole idea of slates. People urging me to support a slate really puts my dander up, I feel like they aren’t asking me to think for myself, just follow this predetermined line. In internal Labour Elections I work at finding out who the candidates are, if anyone can vouch for them personally and what their record is like. Then I vote for Ken Livingstone because Ken. I make no apologies for my total political fangirling around Red Ken, when first elected I was given a copy of his first autobiography and told to read it as “the most complete and in-depth book available on local government” (one day I hope to get him to sign it).
So Johanna standing as an individual, not on any slates intrigued me. I felt rather inclined to vote for her simply because of that. Then I learnt more about her and was very interested. A Labour activist since she was 16, growing up in a Scottish CLP as the granddaughter of a Killoch Pit miner, then a London CLP Secretary for 9 years and also a national officer for the Prospect Union. Having never met a representative of the NEC she was determined to shake things up and give members more of a stake in their National Executive Committee. Now in the Labour Party independent candidates don’t win, the slates have money and strength. (She didn’t win, but due to the elevation of Oona King to the Lords she got on as the next highest supported candidate. She lost by only 172 votes In itself a huge achievement)
When she took her seat on the NEC expectations were high, and she didn’t disappoint. From the start she maintained a steady flow of communication in both directions, few active members can claim not to have heard of her regular reports. She publicised what she was doing and what decisions were being made, both through her reports (sent to CLPs, published on Labourlist, advertised on twitter) and her blog. You can also contact her directly on Twitter, she’s one of the most accessible people I know on there!
Apart from her skillful use of electronic media she did something which surprised and delighted me, in her first 52 weeks she visited 52 CLPS (you still owe Gedling a visit Jo). Not only was this something that had never been done before. but she did it off her own bat, in her own time and using her own money.
Not only was I impressed by her hard work and dedication but I was starting to class her amongst my good friends (bias alert) So when the 2012 election came up I was very happy to pitch in and campaign for her. But really her work speaks for itself and that’s why she was re-elected, not due to any campaigning, but due to her.
So hopefully if you read this you will click on some of the links i’ve scattered like confetti through this article, contact her and make your mind up.
I will remain #TeamJohanna
I was fortunate enough to be asked to contribute to this report and honoured to be mentioned (not by name) in today’s debate.
// <![CDATA[ src="http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Embed/js.ashx?13730 460x322"> // ]]>
Im gonna give this microblogging lark a try.
Im currently at the Global Labour Institute’s international summer school in Barnsley. However, as they were over subscribed they put the brits in Stately Wortley Hall – the labour movements country house.
Having always wanted to stay at Wortley Hall i was over the moon. The icing on the cake was running into the 90 year old son of the founder Vin Williams who gave u
I was invited to address the RMT’s Women’s Conference in Nottingham recently.
Welcome sisters, or as we say in Nottingham “ey up me ducks”
I am delighted to welcome you all to beautiful Nottingham, city of legends.
I imagine that many of you will have arrived at Nottingham Rail Station. I know that it is looking a bit sorry for itself at present as it is in the middle of being refurbished. Locally, we are looking forward towards the completion of a new transport hub.
You may have come from the station on the tram. If not, the nearest stop is at the end of the street, just by the Royal Centre. Line one (to the north of Nottingham) was jointly developed by the Labour controlled County Council and City Council. The first thing the new Conservative administration at County Hall did was to pull out of the consortium which was building phase 2. Despite this Tory attempt to put a spanner in the development of public transport the City Council has pushed on with lines 2 and 3 to the West of Nottingham. These are due to open in late 2014 and should relieve some of the traffic problems which bedevil us, especially at rush hours.
I hope that if you come back to Nottingham next year, either for a future conference or just to visit the Queen of the midlands, you’ll see a big improvement in our public transport.
I hope that while you are here you’ll take the opportunity to get out and explore Nottingham. Although Nottingham is advertised as the city of legends (Robin Hood, Brian Clough) to my mind it has a bigger claim to the title of “city of radical progressive politics”.
Just one word of warning though, if you visit our famous castle you may be somewhat disappointed. It doesn’t look like a mediaeval castle at all (it’s got no turrets, no keep, no moat) and it’s certainly nothing like Hollywood would have you believe. There was a Norman Castle on the site, Richard the Lionheart laid siege to it when his brother John took refuge and Richard the third rode out from it to the Battle of Bosworth. Although King Charles I raised his standard by the castle and started the Civil War here, for most of the time Nottingham was a parliamentary stronghold. After the execution of Charles I in 1649, the castle was demolished to prevent its re-use. The first Duke of Newcastle then built a mansion on the site.
However in 1831 this building was attacked and razed to the ground by Nottingham people protesting at the Duke of Newcastle’s opposition to Parliamentary reform. The mansion remained a derelict shell until it was restored in 1875 and opened in 1878 as the Nottingham Castle Museum, the first municipal art gallery in the UK outside of London
Nottingham’s long radical history runs from Saxons defending their independence against the Vikings, through Robin Hood (the Civil War,), Luddism, the Reform Riots Chartism, the General Strike and through to the Spanish Civil War. This continues up to today, with the many industrial struggles which have rocked Nottingham over the last 80 years.
Indeed Nottingham was the only place to send a Chartist to Parliament. Feargus Edward O’Connor was elected in 1847. Although he is largely forgotten today a statue of him sits in Nottingham Arboretum.
The people of Nottingham are known for being no respecters of person when in pursuit of their aims. In 1764, during the so called “cheese riots” those protesting against price increase bowled huge cheeses down the street. Attempts by the local mayor to quell the mob resulted in his dignity being flattened by a 100lb cheese. (I must admit that I have a list of politicians I’d like to see flattened by a cheese).
More recently during the Poll Tax Protests a council meeting was ended when local Councillors were attacked with custard pies. Yet again Nottingham was at the forefront of the campaign and was reportedly fourth in the national league for non-payment. Official figures show that over one third of people weren’t paying.
Nottingham has also been long known for the strength of its women’s organisations. From the middle of the nineteenth century young women became the main source of labour in the lace factories. This led to the City’s reputation as home to many young, attractive, self-sufficient women. As a result the Nottingham Trade Union of Women Workers in the Lace Trade, and The Nottingham Female Political Union flourished.
The Nottingham Co-operative Women’s Guild aimed to improve the conditions of women especially in poor neighbourhoods., Nottingham Women’s Welfare Centre opened in 1926 as only the third birth control clinic ever in England .
In 1971 a group of Women’s Liberation activists opened a women’s centre out of the front room of one of their members. A number of organisations gravitated to the centre and once they had dedicated premises they were able to form a focus point for groups such as Women’s Abortion & Contraception Group, Lesbian Group, Feminist Theory Group & ‘Battered Wives.’ (Now known as women’s aid) By organising together despite opposition, they managed to provide a strong women’s centre that has helped to contribute to the environment in Nottingham, which has encouraged, educated and supported women to be leaders and influencers.
All of this shows why Nottingham is such a good place for the RMT’s women’s conference.
However, there will be some people who question the need for women’s conferences and women’s organisations within trades unions.
There’s no doubt that the nature of trades unionism has changed. As of January this year there were 53 unions affiliated to the TUC representing some 6 million workers. In 2000, 38.5% of the affiliated membership to the TUC was female, today it is 49% In unions representing public sector workers (including health and teaching) women are the majority, up to 70%. In comparison the same figures show that of the 76,000 RMT members some 12% are female.
We know that trades unions are good for women. Studies, show that workers in unionised workplaces are far better off than those in non-unionised workplaces and that this is particularly true for women. Trade unions are agents of greater equality – economic, sexual and racial.
In unionised workplaces:
And trades unions often offer access to education and training which help their members.
This is significant in the face of the Government’s austerity programme. The cuts to important public services will affect many of us as users but will also disproportionately affect women as employees. And we’ve seen the number of firms that have gone bust in recent months – all our high streets bear the scars of the Government “talking the economy down”.
So given the increase in women in trade unions and the attacks on women’s services we could ask why aren’t women more active in trade unions. There seem to be a number of factors at play which still means that much of the trade union culture is male-dominated.
If we are to recruit and retain women members and represent them effectively then unions need to strive to become more women-friendly.
I’d like to play tribute to the RMT for providing a women-friendly space through conferences such as this. I appreciate that being a trade union representative is frequently difficult in the workplace so I would encourage you to take advantage of this women’s only event to explore issues, share experiences, and consider how you can support each other. Personally I’m a great believer in the value of social media in helping build networks between people who may be isolated. I hope that you’ll all come out of the Conference feeling its been worthwhile.
I can see from the agenda that you have a busy couple of days ahead. But I hope that you will get some time to explore my fine city.
Once again, welcome to Nottingham
 1999 by Professor David Metcalf from the Centre for Economic Performance (CEP)
 Research carried out among organisations affiliated to European Trades Union Confederation in 2002